Topic: 2050.
There are no members reading this topic.
Posted on January 8, 2012 2:57 PM
Contribution: 1,715 (1,645 + 70)
Joined: November 22, 2010
What the world will be like, etc. 'Im curious.....
Posted on January 8, 2012 3:12 PM
not so much is gonna change i believe

Special thanks to Edeath.
Posted on January 8, 2012 3:15 PM
Contribution: 1,715 (1,645 + 70)
Joined: November 22, 2010
Edit: Oh, nuu, can't because it's turned off here.

Don't you think we're gonna have security bots and all? I think we are. Oh my God, that's so scientifical. <3
Posted on January 8, 2012 3:18 PM
yeah we will but not so near. maybe arround 2080 we will have the bots. jugjing by the curren democracy, there are many things to be done first before that.Lol. Apple Product. Sorry but you've made me lol so hard. In a very postive way, of course. Thus you'll get a thumb-up from me.
Edit: Oh, nuu, can't because it's turned off here.
Don't you think we're gonna have security bots and all? I think we are. Oh my God, that's so scientifical. <3

Special thanks to Edeath.
Posted on January 8, 2012 3:24 PM
Contribution: 1,715 (1,645 + 70)
Joined: November 22, 2010
Even though it's being hotly debated whether we can afford it.
Posted on January 8, 2012 5:08 PM
(...)yeah we will but not so near. maybe arround 2080 we will have the bots. jugjing by the curren democracy, there are many things to be done first before that.
Do you even know what democracy is? Funny enough, Democracy has nothing to do with this.
Anyway, what i see happening in the future is no snow, not here, not anywhere. What i also see is the population vastly over populating.
Posted on January 8, 2012 5:22 PM
Posted on January 8, 2012 5:25 PM
And we all know how eager Russia actually is when it comes to backing up any country that goes against America.
Apart from that, there's the plunging crisis in the Europe, overturning of political status in the middle-east... so all in all; we are in for a rather unpredictable future.

Join Low on WarOfNinja.com - Your #1 Online Ninja Multiplayer Game
=Official Maldivian Retreat=
Click to request stuff at our shop Dat Kame-Sama
My Shppeh. Click it like, right now!
Posted on January 8, 2012 5:37 PM
Posted on January 8, 2012 5:42 PM
Contribution: 1,715 (1,645 + 70)
Joined: November 22, 2010
Posted on January 8, 2012 7:43 PM
No Darkbatallion666, it's not going to be gone. The NASA has been working on some projects regarding the planet that we will be able to live on.
You mean how they are looking for other inhabitable planets? That's not so we can live there, but because we are looking for other life forms in the universe. Even if it was so we could live on it, there is very little chance that we will be able to find a way to travel to whatever planet it is inhabitable, especially since the US has canceled its space program.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.
Posted on January 10, 2012 1:49 PM
Contribution: 1,715 (1,645 + 70)
Joined: November 22, 2010
Why wouldn't we be looking for other planets that we could live on?(...)
You mean how they are looking for other inhabitable planets? That's not so we can live there, but because we are looking for other life forms in the universe. Even if it was so we could live on it, there is very little chance that we will be able to find a way to travel to whatever planet it is inhabitable, especially since the US has canceled its space program.
What you're saying is complete nonsense, so think twice before saying something.
Posted on January 10, 2012 6:39 PM
Contribution: 978 (853 + 125)
Joined: February 19, 2010
(...)
Why wouldn't we be looking for other planets that we could live on?
What you're saying is complete nonsense, so think twice before saying something.
Actually, Rurudo has quite the reason on this one. The "closest" planets that supports human life are extremely far away from Earth (several lightyears of distance), such as Gliese 581G (if I'm not mistaken, I possibly screwed the number... *researches*... no, it's actually correct). To take Gliese as an example, it would take 20.5 years to travel to that planet CONSIDERING we could travel at speed of light. Now, humans are NOWHERE close to constructing a motor capable of such power nor creating any material that would support the stress of travelling at such ludicrous speed.
Trying to find a planet that supports life so humans could mount their settlements there is NOT the intention of scientists. If it was, that would be an useless endeavour.

The moment you think you know everything is the moment that you know nothing.
Taylor's Poem Showcase (Click it. Now.)
Posted on January 10, 2012 7:12 PM
Contribution: 1,715 (1,645 + 70)
Joined: November 22, 2010
Wow, Taylor, I've got to say that I am impressed by your knowledge.(...)
Actually, Rurudo has quite the reason on this one. The "closest" planets that supports human life are extremely far away from Earth (several lightyears of distance), such as Gliese 581G (if I'm not mistaken, I possibly screwed the number... *researches*... no, it's actually correct). To take Gliese as an example, it would take 20.5 years to travel to that planet CONSIDERING we could travel at speed of light. Now, humans are NOWHERE close to constructing a motor capable of such power nor creating any material that would support the stress of travelling at such ludicrous speed.
Trying to find a planet that supports life so humans could mount their settlements there is NOT the intention of scientists. If it was, that would be an useless endeavour.
Congratulations. Don't know how much you read, you're great.

I am in tune with you, Taylor, in part. I go along with you saying that there are hardly any planets in this universe (or the way you call it) that could ever be lived on. Actually, I must admit I am kind of wrong, because by saying that there are hardly any that could ever be lived on, I imply that they have never suited the human lifestyle. This is wrong. First off, mention must be made of the fact that some planets were capable of being lived on by any creatures (human beings, animals, plants, and so forth) around 400 years ago. I remember watching a TV programme a week ago. Jesus, I love National Geographic so much! xD Anyway, I'll get back to the point and make it quite clear that the Venus is a great example for what I am saying or driving at. Some scientists have found out that it was the Garden of Eden 400 years ago. There were oceans, plants, it seems to have been the perfect planet. HOWEVER, now it is surrounded by poisonous gases everywhere, meteors are striking, and so on and so on. So in a way, it has become a living Hell for every single creature. We must also mention the Mars' incapability of being lived on. As far as I can remember, it never was able to be the home of certain creatures for one reason: there is no Ozone layer on the Mars, making the planet inbalanced and all. So we can exlude these two planets from the list. Just the same I am not entirely sure whether the other planets are not able to be the father of some creatures either. I am not sure. Also, I'm not trying to go off topic, but... unless my memory fails me, there are a lot of fallacies. One of them is the belief that every single creature needs light in order to find life. This is incorrect because there are worms about 300 meters deep in the ocean that needs no life.
Yes, these worms don't need light. I'm not sure Taylor, maybe there are some planets you haven't made a mention of, and that can be lived on.
Posted on January 10, 2012 7:24 PM
Contribution: 978 (853 + 125)
Joined: February 19, 2010
(...)
Wow, Taylor, I've got to say that I am impressed by your knowledge.
Congratulations. Don't know how much you read, you're great.
I am in tune with you, Taylor, in part. I go along with you saying that there are hardly any planets in this universe (or the way you call it) that could ever be lived on. Actually, I must admit I am kind of wrong, because by saying that there are hardly any that could ever be lived on, I imply that they have never suited the human lifestyle. This is wrong. First off, mention must be made of the fact that some planets were capable of being lived on by any creatures (human beings, animals, plants, and so forth) around 400 years ago. I remember watching a TV programme a week ago. Jesus, I love National Geographic so much! xD Anyway, I'll get back to the point and make it quite clear that the Venus is a great example for what I am saying or driving at. Some scientists have found out that it was the Garden of Eden 400 years ago. There were oceans, plants, it seems to have been the perfect planet. HOWEVER, now it is surrounded by poisonous gases everywhere, meteors are striking, and so on and so on. So in a way, it has become a living Hell for every single creature. We must also mention the Mars' incapability of being lived on. As far as I can remember, it never was able to be the home of certain creatures for one reason: there is no Ozone layer on the Mars, making the planet inbalanced and all. So we can exlude these two planets from the list. Just the same I am not entirely sure whether the other planets are not able to be the father of some creatures either. I am not sure. Also, I'm not trying to go off topic, but... unless my memory fails me, there are a lot of fallacies. One of them is the belief that every single creature needs light in order to find life. This is incorrect because there are worms about 300 meters deep in the ocean that needs no life.
Yes, these worms don't need light. I'm not sure Taylor, maybe there are some planets you haven't made a mention of, and that can be lived on.
I know what you're saying, Rukia, but the correct train of thought is actually the opposite. We're not (or at least I am not) stating that animals need light to live - the fact there was light is what allows evolution to make use of such feature. However, you need to take into account the fact that, although evolution is possible on such circumstances, the process of evolution cannot be forced or rushed. Therefore, even if evolution allowed those worms (and some kinds of bat and some kinds of deep-sea fish as well) to live without light, light is necessary for human life as it is.
This was my standpoint all along. Of course, when you want to mention a settlement so humans can live on these planets, you need to take into consideration the factors needed to allow human life. Those planets are too far away (most of the planets are made of gaseous matter, most of them do not have an atmosphere, and those that have an atmosphere usually do not have oxygen, or water...) and thus, expecting to search for planets on which life is possible to colonize them is just Sci-Fi material. The researches scientists do is purely out of curiosity about other life forms, exactly what Rurudo stated on his first premise.

The moment you think you know everything is the moment that you know nothing.
Taylor's Poem Showcase (Click it. Now.)
