Topic: 4 on 4
Posted on October 5, 2011 4:38 AM
#1
What do you think about the idea of 4on4 (4 char against 4 instead 3). i know its hard to make the systeam, but i could magine that.
Posted on October 5, 2011 4:39 AM
#2
No, too overpowering, too much going on at once.
Posted on October 5, 2011 5:00 AM
#3
i dont understand the meaning of OP here, both player has same amount of character and item
Posted on October 5, 2011 5:06 AM
#4
It's fine just as it is, so there is no need to change it. 3 is a perfect amount, and 4 is too much anyways.
Posted on October 5, 2011 5:09 AM
#5
I think he means, overpowering in the sense that a four on four would have too many things going on in a match.
The game is sort of balanced around a 3 on 3 anyway. A 4 on 4 would probably require a rework for a lot of characters. Mostly anyone with AoE damage. 4 energy a turn would also make spiker teams a lot more deadly.
The game is sort of balanced around a 3 on 3 anyway. A 4 on 4 would probably require a rework for a lot of characters. Mostly anyone with AoE damage. 4 energy a turn would also make spiker teams a lot more deadly.
"Quotes found on the Internet are not always accurate."
-Abraham Lincoln
-Abraham Lincoln
Posted on October 5, 2011 5:53 AM
#6
xXxMarcelxXx, The Untouchable Champion of Death

Contribution: 5,469 (4,923 + 546)
Joined: July 30, 2010
Contribution: 5,469 (4,923 + 546)
Joined: July 30, 2010
Cheap teams would kill one character in one turn.
So no, this can not be implented.
So no, this can not be implented.
elamento12 - biggest fail ever!

.::My Guide::. - .::Item Abbreviations Guide::. - .::Challenge me::. - .::+15 Streak Teams::. - .::Do you want to be a recruit of me?::.

.::My Guide::. - .::Item Abbreviations Guide::. - .::Challenge me::. - .::+15 Streak Teams::. - .::Do you want to be a recruit of me?::.
Posted on October 5, 2011 7:21 AM
#7
Bad bad idea, no way this will happen in WoN. Too much energy and too many characters at once.
4 vs 4 is what we call Jikkousu aka Uncontrollable
4 vs 4 is what we call Jikkousu aka Uncontrollable
Posted on October 5, 2011 7:59 AM
#8
3 vs 3 is already perfect i think. No need to make it more complicated.
Posted on October 5, 2011 8:20 AM
#9
no bad 3 vs 3 is fine 4 is too much to control :(
Posted on October 5, 2011 8:37 AM
#10
Basically this. 4 team members fighting at the same time would mean characters would die way faster (even in the first turn), which would result into a mess. Also, 3 team members kinda fits the 3 clan members number.I think he means, overpowering in the sense that a four on four would have too many things going on in a match.
The game is sort of balanced around a 3 on 3 anyway. A 4 on 4 would probably require a rework for a lot of characters. Mostly anyone with AoE damage. 4 energy a turn would also make spiker teams a lot more deadly.
So anyway, sure it looks cool to you, but it's not gonna happen.
This topic was closed by 

