Onto number 3: Homosexuals are homosexuals because their brains are the opposite of what they should be, vit.: gay men's brains are feminine, gay women's are masculine.(...)
Allow me to clarify a few things before I state my opinion.
1) Pedophiles are people that are attracted to children.
2) Being attracted to them doesn't mean they would harm them.
3) It's not techniqually a biological issue, it's like saying homosexual people have a biological issue, but they don't, they choose not to conform to what the majority of society believes.
They shouldn't be deemed mentally ill if they believe in things that the rest of society doesn't believe is deemed right. Like homosexuals, if they choose to not conform to society, they have the right to do it. If they choose to be attracted to children, let them have their right and don't tag them mentally ill. BUt if they do/perform acts of indecency against children, of course that would be wrong and terrible.
In conclusion, they should not be deemed mentally ill.
Pedophilia... just to define it: attracted to children, here comes what it boils down to: "children till age 18." If youi're attracted to some 19-year-olds, you're not pedophile, even though you may be 60.(...)I'm a pedophile, are you going to sit there and tell me I've harmed little girls before?
You should leaf through some websites that may help drive it home to you that pedophiles are sexually attracted to children. Bright-spark.Let's break this down.
"Paedophilia" is simply the act of liking children, sexual attraction does not necessarily feature in it in any way.
(Interestingly, if you use "pedophile" with the american spelling, it means "liking of feet".)
Have you ever liked a child? In a non-sexual way? Then you are also a paedophile.
Being sexually attracted to children is a different matter.
While in itself, it causes no problems physically or mentally, it causes a problem when it is acted upon.
It is in itself, much like homosexuality or bisexuality. It cannot be
controlled, if that's what someone is attracted to, it cannot be changed. As I have stated before, the problem is when people act on it.
However, to brand these people as criminal, or handicapped is not right.
Genius... Do leaf through what I've said so far. I said: "We treat them with anti-testosterone medicines." You know what that means? I bet not. It means that their hormones are reduced.(...)
If it's not right to act on these impulses, and someone acts on them, what do you propose we do? Just let the go with a slap on the wrist? Because I really don't think that would make them stop. If we don't want people to do something, there has to be punishments for it, and the acts we want committed least garner the highest penalties. We definitely don't want anyone to be sexually abused, especially children. That is why Paedophiles are branded criminals.
As for your first point, sure, paedophilia literally means loving children, but homosexuality means "same sex," which wouldn't make sense in the context it is used. However, that is merely semantics. When someone says paedophile, they don't mean someone who loves kids, they mean someone that has sexual feelings for children. Besides, though the root of the word is Latin, it is no longer such; thus, there is no need to interpret it literally.
Oh my God, that's so... stupid, really. Do you even know how we treat them? Hm? You're sent to jail for acting on your desires. Example: Penn State Scandal. He's gottten approx. 5 years, to my best knowledge. Wait, what? God, you really should look before you leap. No, I mean business! You're implying that if they don't adapt to society, they still have to be respected. What? Are you serious? Terrorists don't adept to society. Criminals don't. What do they get? They're sent to jail.(...)
Allow me to clarify a few things before I state my opinion.
1) Pedophiles are people that are attracted to children.
2) Being attracted to them doesn't mean they would harm them.
3) It's not techniqually a biological issue, it's like saying homosexual people have a biological issue, but they don't, they choose not to conform to what the majority of society believes.
They shouldn't be deemed mentally ill if they believe in things that the rest of society doesn't believe is deemed right. Like homosexuals, if they choose to not conform to society, they have the right to do it. If they choose to be attracted to children, let them have their right and don't tag them mentally ill. BUt if they do/perform acts of indecency against children, of course that would be wrong and terrible.
In conclusion, they should not be deemed mentally ill.
Posted on December 2, 2011 1:31 PM
I can't think of a better place for them than a mental asylum..
